OK, maybe I'm completely ignorant, but I just don't get it. Seems to me that it's simply sloooow lindy done to blues/bluesy music. Just had a conversation with a friend on this very subject, so I know I'm not alone in this....but my biggest problem is that blues dancing requires an awful lot…
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Ogden" Dancing is dancing, take Lindy off the pedestal. People dance to have a good time. We treat Lindy like it's folk art and seem to think that it always was, but at one time, it was just a dance. It may have even been a lot more fun when it was just dancing and not "Lindy Hop".
It's nice to step out on the floor and dance without having to worry about preserving that leagacy.
Ogden, just to be clear, no where in this discussion did I once mention Lindy Hop. I don't have it on a pedestal and my issues with what I see in "blues rooms" and from "blues dancers" have absolutely nothing to do with Lindy Hop whatsoever.
To be honest, if people just called it all "dancing," while I may still be creeped out by certain individualistic behaviour, I wouldn't be nearly as irritated by the scene on the whole.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Alligator" Incidentally I had this IM conversation right after Keither's list with follow I totally respect and love dancing with (blues, lindy hop, whatever.) I can't cut and paste, but will just put the major part.
Quote Me: Can you believe Keither put (person A) and (person B) as people who aren't into grinding?
Anon Follow: Oh Good God
Me: You didn't notice that?
Anon Follow: They are like, i won't dance with those guys gross grinders
Me: so you agree?
Anon Follow: (Person A) Absolutely
Anon Follow: creepy creepy blechy
Anon Follow: You can anonymously quote me if you need to
Anon Follow: I know I put it in a very pithy way.
So no wonder people still feel that there's too much grinding when a couple of "established" teachers can still give off that creep vibe.
Nando, I know what you're trying to do here, and I'm sure I can guess the people you've blanked out , but please, if you're going to do something like this, please use actual names for person A and person B.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
i dunno.
i know i'm in the minority, but "creepy" IS subjective and once anyone is labelled that way, it's damn near impossible to get rid of it. and i happen to disagree re: the people in question (er, i think). but that's MY personal opinion.
but hey, for all i know, i could be person a or b. i'm just sayin.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "yes." i dunno.
i know i'm in the minority, but "creepy" IS subjective and once anyone is labelled that way, it's damn near impossible to get rid of it. and i happen to disagree. but that's MY personal opinion.
but hey, for all i know, i could be person a or b. i'm just sayin.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "yes." actually, josh, i thought there were some good points made. not nearly the rantfest into which other blues threads have disintegrated :dunno:
yeah, but he was just following suit.
Quote Its become an invitation to any would-be snob who wants to trash on something they look down on.
Martin, I'm not into calling those people out, and people are entitled to their opinions. But I think it's a telling sign about the way some people see the National blues scene.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Yeah, I realized, too late, you didn't bring up Lindy, it's a knee-jerk reaction sometimes.
Quoted from "Swifty"
To be honest, if people just called it all "dancing," while I may still be creeped out by certain individualistic behaviour, I wouldn't be nearly as irritated by the scene on the whole.
What I don't get is why anyone is really irritated by it at all.
Not that I am a fan of the grinding, but if you walked by a club and saw people grinding on each other it wouldn't bug you, but it does in a "blues room"? Why?
I bugs me because I use the term "Blues Dance" to describe some of my dancing and I don't want people thinking that what I do is what they see going on some dance floors as "Blues Dancing".
But why does it bother people who have no interest whatsoever in Blues Dance?
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Nando,
My point is that when you basically say "two people from this list are creepy, but I'm not going to tell you who," it paints all of the people there in that light. If someone doesn't know Charlie and Heidi for example, they might let that doubt fall on them ... I'm not comfortable with that, but I know where you're coming from.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Keither" Like you, Alligator?
Last time I checked, you and your unnamed follow were not authorities on the national blues scene any more than I am.
Nando knows dancing and he's has been to many an exchange. He's not one to misjudge something on prejudice. Give him a break :)
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
My 2 cents.
A dance is just a dance ... we put our own meanings on top of it, and those meanings I find more enlightening than anything else. As with anyone's hobbies, the passion and energy that we put into them are sometimes reflective of more than just liking a hobby.
And that's why I've pretty much given up on arguing these points ... I hate arguing against hidden meanings ...
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Ogden wrote:
Quote Not that I am a fan of the grinding, but if you walked by a club and saw people grinding on each other it wouldn't bug you, but it does in a "blues room"? Why?
I bugs me because I use the term "Blues Dance" to describe some of my dancing and I don't want people thinking that what I do is what they see going on some dance floors as "Blues Dancing".
IAWTC. I love blues music, a wide spectrum of it, especially faster blues bar type music (John Cole anyone?). However, I am always reserved about going to a "blues dance" because inevitably I will be asked to dance in a style that is uncomfortable for me. As a follow, I only have some control over how much space I have between me and the lead (most of the time), but I do not have control over the kind of dance that is done.
As a dancer brought up in a dance scene rather than in a club scene where it is acceptable to turn everyone down, it puts me in an uncomfortable position of turning people down (and being that B ch) or being creeped out.
And as final note, there are numerous guys out there who don't understand that you can dance in an open position, that there is more to dancing than body roles, and get offended when you push away and keep trying to smoosh you back into them.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
You're right Keither. Apologies if I feel I can stand on my own two feet and give that observation. I'm not the "official" authority. I suppose I need to empty out my savings and attend every blues weekend out there in order to become a viable source. And I suppose if I ask someone who I feel is a respected follow, she must be nobody important too, even though I'm sure most who know me know I wouldn't throw that term to a follow lightly.
I've separated myself from the exchange scene for the past year. But I've still been around Nationally and feel that my observations are valid. Plus, while my views don't make me popular among some of the blues crowd, my discourse is something that is on other people's minds, including the initial poster of this thread.
I will probably be taking a few trips back out in the next couple of months, so the blues crowd that disagrees with me is welcome to frag me or prove me wrong.
And you guys figured it out. The creeps are Ogden and Holly, but since they're now going to be dancing with each other from now on, the Blues scene has been SAVED!!! Hallelujah!
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Alligator"
And you guys figured it out. The creeps are Ogden and Holly, but since they're now going to be dancing with each other from now on, the Blues scene has been SAVED!!! Hallelujah!
You heard the man. Holly, next time we dance GRINDFEST.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Swifty"
People I know that call themselves "blues dancers" - ones I've argued with at length - do swingouts to 90bpm guitar blues and weird body-roll wiggles to songs at 160bpm.
You know, you could've pm'd me about this instead of calling my ass out on yehoodi. Thanks. Thanks a lot.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "yes." actually, josh, i thought there were some good points made. not nearly the rantfest into which other blues threads have disintegrated :dunno:
and the next time i see you, i'm going to rub my business end all over your no-beaver-clamp iron-on patch.
yes yes but it wouldn't be me if I wasn't bitching about something
and as far as your business end.... just let me scottguard first and make sure I have my spatula
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Ogden" But why does it bother people who have no interest whatsoever in Blues Dance?
It bothers me because I'd like to blues dance every once in a while, but at every event I go to where there's a blues room, I can't stand in that dark, sweaty, hormone infested room for more than 2 minutes before my prudish self bolts for the door. It also bugs me because I enjoy blues to actual blues music, and I wish there were more of it. I'd never travel for a blues event because I know that 75 of the experience will be stuff that makes me uncomfortable, and that's a shame. I went to one night of a blues event in my own city, and the first DJ up played some awesome true blues music and the floor was dead. The next DJ played Gwenneth Paltrow and Babyface and other pop music and the floor revived. That makes me sad. It's not that I don't like the dancing most "blues" dancers do. If it makes you happy, go for it. It's more that I wish they used another word so that blues music and blues dancing can have a fighting chance.
edited to add - it also bugs me because when a blues song comes on and someone asks me to dance, I never know what I'm going to get. In lindy, 9 times out of 10, if it's a "bad" dance, it's just because there's a low skill level or no musicality or something silly that I can cope with. I can still have fun. On a blues song, I stand a pretty high chance of feeling violated. I'm much less likely to say yes to someone I don't know, just to avoid that incredibly negative experience. And that's a shame.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "Alligator" I also know remember back in the day certain National instructors who were willing to teach "teachers." They would give workshops on teaching and educating their students. There was a desire there for people to take those classes. I haven't seen as much of that in the blues community.
The Portland, OR blues community has taken this seriously and is a few steps down the path already: those who have helped grow the blues community were given a free ride to learn from Solomon when he was last in town. If things work out, we'll have Ogden and Amanda out here, too, for more of the same. I'll chat with Scott W. and see if we can't add one more class or at least a drinkin' escapade focused on the teaching aspects involved.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "grasshopper" It's not that I don't like the dancing most "blues" dancers do. If it makes you happy, go for it. It's more that I wish they used another word so that blues music and blues dancing can have a fighting chance.
To me, calling it "blues dancing" is peoples' way of recognizing the roots of the dance; it's a matter of respect.
We could always call it what it is: "Partnered improvisational flexible-embrace progressive jazz/blues movement... con qu so", but "PIF-EPJ/BM...CQ" just doesn't roll off the tongue as easily.
...
On the other hand, one could argue that the tongue-roll is a historically accurate depiction of mumble mumble hide :green:
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "ua" To me, calling it "blues dancing" is peoples' way of recognizing the roots of the dance; it's a matter of respect.
Roots or not, what's done in most blues rooms these days has very little to do with blues. Even Ogden agreed on that:
Quoted from "Ogden" I bugs me because I use the term "Blues Dance" to describe some of my dancing and I don't want people thinking that what I do is what they see going on some dance floors as "Blues Dancing".
Honestly, why not just call it club dancing or something? Cuz that's really what it is, especially given the predominant music I hear coming out of blues rooms. And there's nothing wrong with that. To me it's like looking at a West Coast couple and saying they're doing lindy hop. Sure, they're related, and one has roots in the other, but they're hardly the same dance. I'm with Swifty. Call a spade a spade and don't sweat it.
To be honest, I think this is mostly a moot debate. Most lindy hoppers that enjoy blues are in the group that enjoy the club version over the other. As long as there's a demand, "modern blues dancing," or whatever you want to call it, will thrive. And that's fine with me. I just won't go to blues weekends. shrug
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
Quoted from "grasshopper" To be honest, I think this is mostly a moot debate. Most lindy hoppers that enjoy blues are in the group that enjoy the club version over the other. As long as there's a demand, "modern blues dancing," or whatever you want to call it, will thrive. And that's fine with me. I just won't go to blues weekends. shrug
The point was, there are those of us who are trying to draw a distinction between modern blues dance and club dancing. From page 2:
Quoted from "Keither" I want to create a distinction (which, granted, some people will see as artificial) between people dancing the blues and people grinding all up on each other. Most people's impressions of "blues dancing" is what they've seen in the late night slow room at lindy exchanges. It's a lot of people grinding up on each other. Sometimes that's fun. Sometimes it's not. It's neither a good thing, nor a bad thing, but it's not modern blues dance. Not as it's being taught at a(n inter-)national level.
Originally posted Wednesday, November 23, 2005 (6 years ago)
The thing is, you can make all the discussion board semantic classifications that you want. Until the actual blues dancers in the actual blues rooms get a majority of people doing actual blues dancing instead of the stuff that's more like club dancing, you aren't changing anything. Hence my point that it's a moot debate.
By the way, I personally think that needs to include the music. Blues dancing to "Cruisin'," to me, is like lindy hopping to "Thriller." It may be fun, but it just ain't right.
Originally posted Thursday, November 24, 2005 (6 years ago)
i think lindy hoppers are whats wrong with blues dancing.
ill give my disclaimer first.
yes most of the major players in blues dancing also consider themselves lindyhoppers. yes, modern blues dancing would be nowhere with out lindyhoppers. and yes, blanket generalizations are never always true. that said, allow me a little liberty here...
more often than not, lindyhoppers create "blues rooms" at exchanges or house parties. late night rooms are prone to some hot sweaty sexyness. many people enjoy that, and thats great. lindyhoppers pass by and see lindyhoppers doing "blues" to sexual healing and think eww. (blues dancers will walk by and think the same thing, really though its more about what they are labeling their dancing, well sometimes its just eww.)
lindy hoppers either think, "i already know how to blues dance, i do it in 'blues rooms' all the time", or "thats that grindy crap, im not interested" and they never take a class or go to a workshop weekend. they never have the benefit of seeing examples of blues dancing.
now is this true of all lindyhoppers? of course not. is this not true of blues dancers? of course not. when i say that many people enjoy some hot sweaty sexyness, i mean people. will some people dance like this all the time? yes.
in reality, most of what lindhoppers think is going on at blues parties and in blues rooms, is exactly what they think it is. this does not mean that is blues dancing. as many have said it isnt even to blues music. the most frustrating thing about blues threads on yehoodi is as follows: what people see being done out there, isnt what im doing or what im talking about when i say blues dancing. "blues dancing" is something else.
what i see happening is, people will show up at blues weekends expecting one thing and will find something else, and their dancing will change. by the end of the weekend i can play a drasticly different set than i can at the begining of the weekend. over the course of the weekend people will gain the tools to dance to a much wider range of blues music.
Someone help me understand blues dancing
OK, maybe I'm completely ignorant, but I just don't get it. Seems to me that it's simply sloooow lindy done to blues/bluesy music. Just had a conversation with a friend on this very subject, so I know I'm not alone in this....but my biggest problem is that blues dancing requires an awful lot…
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > (166 items total)
New signature anyone?
Ogden, just to be clear, no where in this discussion did I once mention Lindy Hop. I don't have it on a pedestal and my issues with what I see in "blues rooms" and from "blues dancers" have absolutely nothing to do with Lindy Hop whatsoever.
To be honest, if people just called it all "dancing," while I may still be creeped out by certain individualistic behaviour, I wouldn't be nearly as irritated by the scene on the whole.
Nando, I know what you're trying to do here, and I'm sure I can guess the people you've blanked out , but please, if you're going to do something like this, please use actual names for person A and person B.
i dunno.
i know i'm in the minority, but "creepy" IS subjective and once anyone is labelled that way, it's damn near impossible to get rid of it. and i happen to disagree re: the people in question (er, i think). but that's MY personal opinion.
but hey, for all i know, i could be person a or b. i'm just sayin.
If you are, then please be creepy with me.
http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow
This from the guy who gave me "Girls Gone Wild" schwag ;)
yeah, but he was just following suit.
Martin, I'm not into calling those people out, and people are entitled to their opinions. But I think it's a telling sign about the way some people see the National blues scene.
http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow
Like you, Alligator?
Last time I checked, you and your unnamed follow were not authorities on the national blues scene any more than I am.
Yeah, I realized, too late, you didn't bring up Lindy, it's a knee-jerk reaction sometimes.
What I don't get is why anyone is really irritated by it at all.
Not that I am a fan of the grinding, but if you walked by a club and saw people grinding on each other it wouldn't bug you, but it does in a "blues room"? Why?
I bugs me because I use the term "Blues Dance" to describe some of my dancing and I don't want people thinking that what I do is what they see going on some dance floors as "Blues Dancing".
But why does it bother people who have no interest whatsoever in Blues Dance?
Nando,
My point is that when you basically say "two people from this list are creepy, but I'm not going to tell you who," it paints all of the people there in that light. If someone doesn't know Charlie and Heidi for example, they might let that doubt fall on them ... I'm not comfortable with that, but I know where you're coming from.
Nando knows dancing and he's has been to many an exchange. He's not one to misjudge something on prejudice. Give him a break :)
My 2 cents.
A dance is just a dance ... we put our own meanings on top of it, and those meanings I find more enlightening than anything else. As with anyone's hobbies, the passion and energy that we put into them are sometimes reflective of more than just liking a hobby.
And that's why I've pretty much given up on arguing these points ... I hate arguing against hidden meanings ...
It's me. Will you still dance with me Holly?
never thought i'd see the day when ogden posted an inane, insipid question.
(iow, anytime, anyplace.)
Ogden wrote:
IAWTC. I love blues music, a wide spectrum of it, especially faster blues bar type music (John Cole anyone?). However, I am always reserved about going to a "blues dance" because inevitably I will be asked to dance in a style that is uncomfortable for me. As a follow, I only have some control over how much space I have between me and the lead (most of the time), but I do not have control over the kind of dance that is done.
As a dancer brought up in a dance scene rather than in a club scene where it is acceptable to turn everyone down, it puts me in an uncomfortable position of turning people down (and being that B ch) or being creeped out.
And as final note, there are numerous guys out there who don't understand that you can dance in an open position, that there is more to dancing than body roles, and get offended when you push away and keep trying to smoosh you back into them.
You're right Keither. Apologies if I feel I can stand on my own two feet and give that observation. I'm not the "official" authority. I suppose I need to empty out my savings and attend every blues weekend out there in order to become a viable source. And I suppose if I ask someone who I feel is a respected follow, she must be nobody important too, even though I'm sure most who know me know I wouldn't throw that term to a follow lightly.
I've separated myself from the exchange scene for the past year. But I've still been around Nationally and feel that my observations are valid. Plus, while my views don't make me popular among some of the blues crowd, my discourse is something that is on other people's minds, including the initial poster of this thread.
I will probably be taking a few trips back out in the next couple of months, so the blues crowd that disagrees with me is welcome to frag me or prove me wrong.
And you guys figured it out. The creeps are Ogden and Holly, but since they're now going to be dancing with each other from now on, the Blues scene has been SAVED!!! Hallelujah!
http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow
You heard the man. Holly, next time we dance GRINDFEST.
Tape it to your leg.
Yeah, and you still didn't flash me!
http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow
You know, you could've pm'd me about this instead of calling my ass out on yehoodi. Thanks. Thanks a lot.
yes yes but it wouldn't be me if I wasn't bitching about something
and as far as your business end.... just let me scottguard first and make sure I have my spatula
Time to break out the CSI light.
It bothers me because I'd like to blues dance every once in a while, but at every event I go to where there's a blues room, I can't stand in that dark, sweaty, hormone infested room for more than 2 minutes before my prudish self bolts for the door. It also bugs me because I enjoy blues to actual blues music, and I wish there were more of it. I'd never travel for a blues event because I know that 75 of the experience will be stuff that makes me uncomfortable, and that's a shame. I went to one night of a blues event in my own city, and the first DJ up played some awesome true blues music and the floor was dead. The next DJ played Gwenneth Paltrow and Babyface and other pop music and the floor revived. That makes me sad. It's not that I don't like the dancing most "blues" dancers do. If it makes you happy, go for it. It's more that I wish they used another word so that blues music and blues dancing can have a fighting chance.
edited to add - it also bugs me because when a blues song comes on and someone asks me to dance, I never know what I'm going to get. In lindy, 9 times out of 10, if it's a "bad" dance, it's just because there's a low skill level or no musicality or something silly that I can cope with. I can still have fun. On a blues song, I stand a pretty high chance of feeling violated. I'm much less likely to say yes to someone I don't know, just to avoid that incredibly negative experience. And that's a shame.
The Portland, OR blues community has taken this seriously and is a few steps down the path already: those who have helped grow the blues community were given a free ride to learn from Solomon when he was last in town. If things work out, we'll have Ogden and Amanda out here, too, for more of the same. I'll chat with Scott W. and see if we can't add one more class or at least a drinkin' escapade focused on the teaching aspects involved.
-Joshua
To me, calling it "blues dancing" is peoples' way of recognizing the roots of the dance; it's a matter of respect.
We could always call it what it is: "Partnered improvisational flexible-embrace progressive jazz/blues movement... con qu so", but "PIF-EPJ/BM...CQ" just doesn't roll off the tongue as easily.
...
On the other hand, one could argue that the tongue-roll is a historically accurate depiction of mumble mumble hide :green:
Roots or not, what's done in most blues rooms these days has very little to do with blues. Even Ogden agreed on that:
Honestly, why not just call it club dancing or something? Cuz that's really what it is, especially given the predominant music I hear coming out of blues rooms. And there's nothing wrong with that. To me it's like looking at a West Coast couple and saying they're doing lindy hop. Sure, they're related, and one has roots in the other, but they're hardly the same dance. I'm with Swifty. Call a spade a spade and don't sweat it.
To be honest, I think this is mostly a moot debate. Most lindy hoppers that enjoy blues are in the group that enjoy the club version over the other. As long as there's a demand, "modern blues dancing," or whatever you want to call it, will thrive. And that's fine with me. I just won't go to blues weekends. shrug
that should be mandatory after all of these "blues parties"... anyone who um..leaves behind "evidence" will be marked and everyone can be warned!!!
ugh.. i think i just threw up a little
The point was, there are those of us who are trying to draw a distinction between modern blues dance and club dancing. From page 2:
The thing is, you can make all the discussion board semantic classifications that you want. Until the actual blues dancers in the actual blues rooms get a majority of people doing actual blues dancing instead of the stuff that's more like club dancing, you aren't changing anything. Hence my point that it's a moot debate.
By the way, I personally think that needs to include the music. Blues dancing to "Cruisin'," to me, is like lindy hopping to "Thriller." It may be fun, but it just ain't right.
i think lindy hoppers are whats wrong with blues dancing.
ill give my disclaimer first.
yes most of the major players in blues dancing also consider themselves lindyhoppers. yes, modern blues dancing would be nowhere with out lindyhoppers. and yes, blanket generalizations are never always true. that said, allow me a little liberty here...
more often than not, lindyhoppers create "blues rooms" at exchanges or house parties. late night rooms are prone to some hot sweaty sexyness. many people enjoy that, and thats great. lindyhoppers pass by and see lindyhoppers doing "blues" to sexual healing and think eww. (blues dancers will walk by and think the same thing, really though its more about what they are labeling their dancing, well sometimes its just eww.)
lindy hoppers either think, "i already know how to blues dance, i do it in 'blues rooms' all the time", or "thats that grindy crap, im not interested" and they never take a class or go to a workshop weekend. they never have the benefit of seeing examples of blues dancing.
now is this true of all lindyhoppers? of course not. is this not true of blues dancers? of course not. when i say that many people enjoy some hot sweaty sexyness, i mean people. will some people dance like this all the time? yes.
in reality, most of what lindhoppers think is going on at blues parties and in blues rooms, is exactly what they think it is. this does not mean that is blues dancing. as many have said it isnt even to blues music. the most frustrating thing about blues threads on yehoodi is as follows: what people see being done out there, isnt what im doing or what im talking about when i say blues dancing. "blues dancing" is something else.
what i see happening is, people will show up at blues weekends expecting one thing and will find something else, and their dancing will change. by the end of the weekend i can play a drasticly different set than i can at the begining of the weekend. over the course of the weekend people will gain the tools to dance to a much wider range of blues music.
and dance to some robert johnson bitches!!!
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > (166 items total)
BBCode is no longer supported. Use Markdown instead: