Apologies if this has come up before, but I figured that if the Yehoodi folk have not found this then it probably desn't exist. I have tried to find the newspaper cover that was supposedly used as the inspiration for the term "Lindy Hop". I am sure you all know the story told by…
Originally posted Monday, December 14, 2009 (2 years ago)
The article above is dated March 1931. Though it probably doesn't add anything to the "who named what when" question, an article in the "Kansas City Call" dated July 10, 1931 mentions the the "new" Lindy Hop dance. It was going to be demonstrated by Woodie Walder, who was one of the musicians in Bennie Moten's Orchestra.
Originally posted Tuesday, December 15, 2009 (2 years ago)
Thanks especially to Judy, Ake and Lindy George for posting up those clippings, none of which I'd seen before, although I've read similar material to the latter.
I take the view that 'history' is always about the present, and thus there are underlying reasons why we are collectively interested in considering these issues at the present, and maybe even why it is resulting in productive exchanges.
As some of you know I've been fretting about this Lindbergh issue for a number of years, but only now is it beginning to make sense. I can't help but feel that the loss of Frankie hangs over us all, and is provoking new thinking. To put it briefly, the Lindy Hop can't do without its real history.
I do agree with Ake though, the important thing is to publish results which I'm attempting to get on with and complete, but at times I feel I can't ignore significant discussions when they spring up.
and I also checked Google's advanced search which has now leapt to 23,900 since I last checked a couple of weeks ago - can this mistaken notion really be multiplying that fast?
Originally posted Wednesday, December 16, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan" Just noticed a related discussion on the BBC website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/strictlycomedancing/F14713549?thread=7148544
and I also checked Google's advanced search which has now leapt to 23,900 since I last checked a couple of weeks ago - can this mistaken notion really be multiplying that fast?
Terry, why do those peoplle talk funny?
Everyone has gotta read that thread, it's hillarious. At first I thought it was a comedy script written about clueless people who never heard of this lindy hop dance.
Originally posted Wednesday, December 16, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan" Thanks especially to Judy, Ake and Lindy George for posting up those clippings, none of which I'd seen before, although I've read similar material to the latter.
I take the view that 'history' is always about the present, and thus there are underlying reasons why we are collectively interested in considering these issues at the present, and maybe even why it is resulting in productive exchanges.
As some of you know I've been fretting about this Lindbergh issue for a number of years, but only now is it beginning to make sense. I can't help but feel that the loss of Frankie hangs over us all, and is provoking new thinking. To put it briefly, the Lindy Hop can't do without its real history.
I do agree with Ake though, the important thing is to publish results which I'm attempting to get on with and complete, but at times I feel I can't ignore significant discussions when they spring up.
Terry, I re-read this thread. You mentioned in the earlier post (the second post in the thread Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:44 am):
" (And even then it should be remembered that he only gave Marshall Stearns this account in 1959, although he had given other versions of the same story previously to other interviewers.) "
I wonder where we can find those other versions of the story, which Shorty George gave to other interviewers?
Originally posted Wednesday, December 16, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "frankyboy" I had also found a couple of other articles that meantioned lindburg taking a hop in the text of the article but not the actualy title, and usually re a flight he took somewhere in the US, not across the atlantic. I wonder if it become a common term used at the time that pilots "took a hop" when referring to short flights, or were any flights Lindberg took after crossing the atlantic considered shorts flights and referred to as just a "hop" by the media?
Hi!
John sent me a few links: One to the newspaper site, where the term 'hop' is used in the connection to the Lindbergh flight:
Frankyboy, are these the same articles that you found?
In addition to that 'hop' is a slang term for a dance that goes back at least to 1913:
http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/hop
Those in addition to Peter BetBasoo's discoveries. There seemed to be several possibilities to name The (Harlem) Lindy Hop also according to Charles Lindbergh's famous flight. I think that there are reasons to take the Lindbergh connection back to discussion.
Originally posted Wednesday, December 16, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "AKE"
Quoted from "frankyboy" I had also found a couple of other articles that meantioned lindburg taking a hop in the text of the article but not the actualy title, and usually re a flight he took somewhere in the US, not across the atlantic. I wonder if it become a common term used at the time that pilots "took a hop" when referring to short flights, or were any flights Lindberg took after crossing the atlantic considered shorts flights and referred to as just a "hop" by the media?
Hi!
John sent me a few links: One to the newspaper site, where the term 'hop' is used in the connection to the Lindbergh flight:
http://www.newspaperarchive.com/FreePdfViewer.aspx?topic=1927 3a Lindbergh begins trans-Atlantic flight&img=31127423&terms=Lindbergh&dpviewdate=05 2f20 2f07&firstvisit=true
There are at least two references with 'hop'.
Frankyboy, are these the same articles that you found?
In addition to that 'hop' is a slang term for a dance that goes back at least to 1913:
http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/hop
Those in addition to Peter BetBasoo's discoveries. There seemed to be several possibilities to name The (Harlem) Lindy Hop also according to Charles Lindbergh's famous flight. I think that there are reasons to take the Lindbergh connection back to discussion.
Not sure as it didn't give me anymore then the sentence the search phrase was in (think I posted it earlier in thread but not sure). I did the free sample search so don't have results saved.[/i]
Originally posted Friday, December 18, 2009 (2 years ago)
Frankyboy wrote:
Quote Terry, why do those peoplle talk funny?
Basically as the whole International (British) Competition style is full of pretension on the inside, with an arbitrary and thus meaningless assortment of dance technique aspects on the outside, that is simply meant to convey how superior is dancers really are. Hence the familiar banalities of referring to 'ballroom jive' as 'jive' and as a 'Latin dance' when in fact it is neither. Once they have to depart from their usual clich s they really don't know what to say, and out comes the nonsense. I've written enough about this in the past, and thus don't want to repeat myself again! Just a little bit of conscientious research would come up with a background explanation that this non-American use of the word 'jive' stems from the HMB changing the neame of the relevent category to 'jitterbug-jive' in 1942 that was then shortened to the latter, and different variations of it have emerged subsequently. But that would mean taking 'the colonials' seriously in cultural matters, and of course that is unthinkable!
Re the other points - my major concern right now is with synthesis of understanding rather than endlessly trawling for 'new' individual facts. Any worthwhile discussion needs to refer to what has been agreed so far in order to get more specific about precise areas of misunderstanding or uncertainty. Thus various people have been over that Lindbergh Hop thing at different times, (including myself who rescued it from several decades of being forgotten), and thus most people who have taken an interest now agree it did exist as a dance, and although proceeding the Lindy Hop it also ran in parallel with it, and thus is not the same dance.
Similarly with Snowden's interviews. For various reasons I don't have them to hand, but I can assure you they say the same thing as the Stearns interview, with the exception of one, that asserts that he and Mattie created the dance by accident. A plausible story, that I think has been repeated elsewhere anyway. The best verification of Snowden's story is in Carl Van Vechten's novel "Parties" that was published in 1930, and thus considerable before Snowden's viewpoint is known to have appeared in print. Incidentally as best as I can remember it doesn't mention CL.
The main advantage we now have in researching this area is that we can compare the new interest in the Lindy and Savoy that has emerged outside Harlem since the beginning of the 1980s with the original Savoy based one, with which it overlapped. Thus there is an interesting mix of continuities and discontinuities. When I had the issue of the bogus headline "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" literally shoved under my nose in 1987, I realised here was something tangible to look at, especially as it began within the limits of our current experience. So if the argument that it is phoney stands up, yet nevertheless it is spreading round the world at an accelerating rate, by making the necessary additions and subtractions we can use it to understand more about how such myths were generated and spread during the first time round. The current high speed of developments is particularly useful in this respect.
At the same time this provides a more comprehensive reply to the original question as to whether anyone has discovered that headline. One answer is simply "No", but that answer quite reasonably begs a further question 'if so where did this erroneous assertion come from?' I've given one answer to the latter, and other useful points have emerged in this discussion that offer confirmation. Cutting down the associated myths to their just size is, I would suggest, the best way of getting an accurate grip on the subject, and that means explaining their consequences just as much as their origins.
Originally posted Saturday, December 19, 2009 (2 years ago)
[quote="terry monaghan"]Penguinbob wrote:
Quote Thanks Keepa for the Hartford Courant reference, Lance told me about it some time back but I couldn t find it. Funny thing is the description reminds me of how we used to dance the basic Hustle the first time round, which via the Mambo is a kind of derivative of the Lindy!
Terry, I have always wondered about the relationship of Mambo and Cha Cha and dances in the Swing genre. The Hustle is classified as a Swing dance, but it never occurred to me that it would come through the Mambo. This is very illuminating.
I have also wondered about the Cha Cha, whose weight changes are identical to Lindy Hop, and how it may relate to Lindy Hop. I read once it was inspired by Lindy Hop, but I have lost that reference.
Originally posted Sunday, December 20, 2009 (2 years ago)
Hi Keepa
The late Dicky Harris (won the HMB in 1966) of the Mama Lou Parks dancers told me that when he showed friends in Harlem the Mura Dehn footage of mambo at the Savoy that they just couldn't believe that regular young Harlemites were ever that passionate about the Mambo. Yet the infusion was real, and even now its not hard to see the Lindy legacy in Salsa, although of course it just doesn't swing.
Thus there is a parallel between that fast style of rumba/son being put together with big band swing music, and the respective dance styles being changed by the addition of a good helping of Lindy in the early 1950s to produce New York Mambo as we now know it. Hence my irritation with those who say nothing happened in the 1950's in terms of Lindy. The best mambo dancers came to the Savoy, and the best lindy hoppers went to the Palladium!
The hustle emerged in the late 1960s as the NY Latin scene wanted to get back to partner dancing, and it caught on quickly long before Saturday Night Fever. I suspect the besides leading on to Salsa, the Hustle also had an impact on the emergence of West Coast Swing as we know it, but I realise some people boil over with anger at that suggestion!
Re the Cha-Cha, it wasn't really a partner dance originally, so I doubt a direct Lindy connection, but of course it became the major dance expression of Doo Wop as so many of the key tracks had a Cha-Cha beat. I wouldn't be surprised if it became cross influenced by Lindy remnants as a result of popular dancing to different types of this music, i.e. swing, r&b and latin, which didn't consist of only slow tempos.
And by way of an apology for those annoyed with this seeming departure from the original question - these questions are all part of the incredible versatility and variety of the Lindy Hop which is why it has never needed the 'Lindy Hops The Atlantic' fiction to keep the dance alive.
Terry
ps in relation to Frankyboy's question about why do the Strictly Come Dancing people talk so weird - the finals of the latest series demonstrated why. Despite the clear choice of the judges who voted for a black guy and white girl to come first, a decision it seems supported by most other people in the wider world interested in dancing, the core ballroom fraternity voted for a white couple to win. The bias was obvious, but it remains an embarrasment that the organisers and the BBC in particular don't want to talk about. That discussion site was shut down immediately once the final decision had been announced!
Originally posted Sunday, December 20, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan" Re the Cha-Cha, it wasn't really a partner dance originally, so I doubt a direct Lindy connection, but of course it became the major dance expression of Doo Wop as so many of the key tracks had a Cha-Cha beat.
There is some 50 year old footage people dancing to cha-cha music in this clip. Note they aren't great dancers but still people dancing socially to Cha-cha.
Originally posted Monday, December 21, 2009 (2 years ago)
Deacon Jones wrote:
Quote but still people dancing socially to Cha-cha
possibly there's a misunderstanding here? I doubt whether there were any significant 'performance' cha-cha dancers at all, in otherwords it was all social. The point I was trying to make was that Doo Wop vocal groups used Cha-Cha rhythms in their songs on occasions , thus it would be reasonable to suppose that those dancing to them would actually be socially dancing the Cha-Cha. Perhaps I was being too brief!
Originally posted Wednesday, December 23, 2009 (2 years ago)
(sorry for the further drift
Quoted from "terry monaghan" ...The point I was trying to make was that Doo Wop vocal groups used Cha-Cha rhythms in their songs on occasions , thus it would be reasonable to suppose that those dancing to them would actually be socially dancing the Cha-Cha.
I don't know much about the dancing part, but the reason so much Doo Wop has Latin rhythms is because
a) George Goldner and his buddy Mo Levy, who produced a lot of the greatest stuff and also were two of the biggest crooks ever in the music business, were Latin music and dancing fiends. Goldner actually got his start by founding Tico records in the late 40's, one of the most important early Latin record labels. He also just about invented payolla.
b)Leiber & Stoller loved latin music and rhythms so much that their collection of percussion instruments - used for hits like "Spanish Harlem" - became known in the industry as the "Leiber & Stoller Kit".
Also American folk music has always had lots of songs using latin rhythms eg some of the the biggest names in blues, like Elmore James, recorded a lot of songs in latin time.
and while I know nothing of the latin dancing I do know I would have had the major hots for Mar a Antonieta Pons)
"Style is originality; fashion is fascism.The two are eternally and unalterably opposed." - Lester Bangs
Originally posted Wednesday, December 23, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "keepa"
Quoted from "terry monaghan"
]Thanks Keepa for the Hartford Courant reference, Lance told me about it some time back but I couldn t find it. Funny thing is the description reminds me of how we used to dance the basic Hustle the first time round, which via the Mambo is a kind of derivative of the Lindy!
Terry, I have always wondered about the relationship of Mambo and Cha Cha and dances in the Swing genre. The Hustle is classified as a Swing dance, but it never occurred to me that it would come through the Mambo. This is very illuminating.
Hustle link to lindy seems to be more through the intermediary of East Coast Swing. You can see it in the early Hustle which used a 6-count basic. The footwork used to be some variant of touch-step, triple step. walk-walk. Many of the old time hustle dancers still phrase in 6, whether using the old basic or phrasing the new basic in 6 (&-1-2 3-&-4 5-6). I remember Craig Hutchinson who always included Hustle as a swing dance in his competitions, always taught hustle as a 6-count dance.
Quoted from "keepa"
I have also wondered about the Cha Cha, whose weight changes are identical to Lindy Hop, and how it may relate to Lindy Hop. I read once it was inspired by Lindy Hop, but I have lost that reference.
The relation between Cha Cha/Mambo and Lindy Hop seems to be more one of cross-pollination of music and dance. Musically, it seemed American and Cuban musicians listened to each other and used what they heard as inspiration. Supposedly mambo music developed when Cuban musicians (e.g., Chacao) etc) inspired by jazz/swing made innovations to the music of their day. Similarly you hear about jazz musicians being influenced by "the latin tinge"(e.g., WC Handy, Jelly Roll Morton, etc.). Plus you had musicians who were in both swing and Latin bands; for example, Mario Bauza, the father of Afro-Cuban Jazz, was an important figure in both Chick Webb's and Machito's bands. Finally, you have that whole debate over whether the swing rhythm and clave have common origins.
In regards to dance, you also have proximity that could lead to cross pollination. Up until it was eclipsed by the Palladium, the Savoy Ballroom was a major hub of Latin music and dancing. And you had many dancers who did both. Apparently in the 40s and 50s, Latin dancing was as popular as swing in the black community. I'm not sure if that was primarily just in NYC, but I attended a lecture once about the huge mambo scene that existed in DC back then.
Even now you can see the influence of Lindy/Jazz in the mambo jazz steps and breaks. I was quite surprised to find that Suzy-Qs are the of the first breaks they teach in mambo.
There's another parallel between Cha Cha and Lindy, and that is they both changed because of changes in the music; the tempos moderated some and there was more accents in the music.
Originally posted Friday, December 25, 2009 (2 years ago)
Here is the article, where Herbert 'Whitey' White is mentioned as the creator of The Lindy Hop. I wrote it down here:
The Pittsburgh Courier September 28, 1940:
"Developing New Dance In Honor Of Joe Louis
Herbert White, creator of the famous Lindy Hop, will give the country a new dance some time this year, when he unveils his Joe Louis Shuffle. He's shown here taking a few of his dancers through the paces, getting them in the mood for things to come. Dance is named in honor of the Brown Bomber."
I think that he never really created Joe Louis Shuffle.
Originally posted Saturday, December 26, 2009 (2 years ago)
It s worth keeping this discussion as close to the original question about the elusive Lindbergh headline as it seems there are many out there who still believe that story to be valid. In addition to reiterating that no one has found anything close to that alleged original headline, this discussion has gathered support for the argument that it was manufactured in 1986 by pointing out that no contemporary account during the relevant period 1986-88 mentioned it either. Thus if it had of existed, it is unlikely in the extreme that it wouldn t have been mentioned.
While those issues are still worth digging over, perhaps it s time to look at why this myth came into being?
Put briefly I would suggest that the US embraced the dance and music, and especially the Lindy Hop, that resulted from the creativity of Harlem in the 1920-30s a lot more quickly than it ever did the community responsible. The Lindbergh myth thus filled the tricky gap that emerged by the lack of any satisfactory explanation for a dance which took off with such dramatic speed. Any relevant detailed factual enquiry inevitably bumps up against this issue, thus prompting to those not that bothered with the theory of it all to take the easy way out. Thus the faster the dance has spread round the world in recent times, the Lindbergh headline myth has grown equally quickly.
Recent contributions provide useful examples of this underlying reluctance to acknowledge the creative impact of Harlem itself:
CafeSavoy wrote:
Quote until it was eclipsed by the Palladium, the Savoy Ballroom was a major hub of Latin music and dancing.
Latin music and dance grew steadily at the Savoy from when it was first introduced there in the early 1930s, until it closed in 1958. The Palladium thus never 'eclipsed' the Savoy, but it did do something dramatically different. Contrary to widespread misconception, it was Peurto Rican musicians and dancers who led the way there in creating the new NY style of Mambo - as oppossed to 'Cubans', a development that the Savoy supported enthusiastically. For the duration it was a NY v Cuban thing (echoes of which still exist) rather than any sense of rivalry between the two ballrooms. The Savoy never deviated from its major function of catering to major sections of the African Diaspora that congregated in NY.
[/b] also re:
Quote Many of the old time hustle dancers still phrase in 6,
That just seems a bit too vague. I can only cite my own experience in that we did four walk steps with the skip one either at the end or the beginning, and as in London we were pretty low down the food chain at the time in terms of the original scene of the dance, I think it indicative of popular dance expressions prefering sequences that match the music. Invariably its dance teachers who screw things up by introducing six-counts when the music is 4/4. Let's face it they make more money from the endless complications that this innovation entails!
also re:
Quote There's another parallel between Cha Cha and Lindy, and that is they both changed because of changes in the music
On this issue I stick closer to the Lindbergh story than you evidently do, in the sense that I believe that the dance aspect of Jazz had and has its own development i.e. it wasn't just reacting to the changes in the music. While I disagree that Charles Lindbergh caused that change in the dance, I go for the evidence that others have produced that the dance dimension and the Lindy in particular was a causal factor too in making Swing happen at the end of the 1920s.
Zev wrote:[b]
Quote George Goldner and his buddy Mo Levy, who produced a lot of the greatest stuff and also were two of the biggest crooks ever in the music business, were Latin music and dancing fiends.
Actually I don't think it is much of a 'drift' but relevant. I'd put the empahsis on rather on the 'biggest crooks' aspect, rather than them being 'music and dancing fiends' as the 'Hit Makers' book from which I suspect this point comes from suggests. Goldner was a habitual drunk and Maurice Levy a wannabee Mafioso, who for obvious reasons couldn't join up. President Eisenhower(I think he was on the throne at the time?) probably knew more about Doo Wop than either of those two did. Even that book indicates that Goldner and Levy didn't know anything other than how to make money by taking advantage of other people s creativity. Levy became involved in Doo Wop when he realised why use illegal force to get regular payments (Mafia style) when he could own the copyright and do the same thing legally? They had to be told which Doo Wop group to sign up, let alone what to mix up with Latin influences.
Originally posted Saturday, December 26, 2009 (2 years ago)
Here's a reproduction print of the May 20, 1927 edition of The Baltimore News. Given the other headlines I've seen posted, Lindy was apparently hopping all over.
Originally posted Saturday, December 26, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan" It s worth keeping this discussion as close to the original question about the elusive Lindbergh headline as it seems there are many out there who still believe that story to be valid.
From "Let's Dance" by Peter Buckman, printed in 1978 (page 189):
Quote
The hop had been around before Charles Lindbergh grabbed the imagination of the entire world by flying the Atlantic single handed. Some say that the lindy hop was namesd in his honor when one of a number of ecstatic dancers leaped across eht floor saying, "Look! I'm flying just like Lindbergh". Others say that the dance with its improvised steps, was just lent Lindbergh's by dancers oppressed by machine induced uniformity.
Originally posted Sunday, December 27, 2009 (2 years ago)
The original question concerned the alleged specific headline "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" - to trawl through each and every reference to Lindbergh probably couldn't be handled by all the dance forums put together. But if you can find a reference to that actual headline before 1986, that would be of great interest!
Originally posted Sunday, December 27, 2009 (2 years ago)
This website contains a number of news papers archived from all over:
http://www.newspaperarchive.com
While there is no match for the exact phrase: "Lindy Hops Atlantic" or "Lindbergh hops Atlantic". When you do a search for "all of the words" you come across several articles about Lindbergh and the term is used all over in this period for flights. There are articles about 'Zeppelin hops'.
Unfortunately this site is a paying site so if you care enough about the answer to subscribe feel free to do so.
Given the current use of the "hops" term in conjunction with Lindy, the story is plausible.
I checked a page dedicated to Lindbergh to see if there were any newspaper scans. There were not but there were PDF files of the FBI dossier on him which in itself is interesting as he was beleived to be a Nazi sympathizer:
Originally posted Sunday, December 27, 2009 (2 years ago)
Hi Deacon
no question about it, and you certainly don't have to spend money to find that out, Lindbergh was most defininately a Nazi lover - and to quote him precisely it was the "Jews and the English" who were responsible for WW2. Adolf it seems was misunderstood, although Lindbergh never said another word about that after the Fuhrer declared war on the USA following Pearl Habour. Sorry not my kind of hero by any measure.
However that is all irrelevent to the original question, as indeed are the sundry other points about Lindbergh and his various 'Hops' which I totally agree abound in many newspaper stories.
Slingshots original question concerned whether the actual newspaper headling "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" had finally been found. And given the huge number of references that are almost entirely derived from swing sites round the world, it seems logical to stick to the point, as all these accounts hinge on Snowden (usually) actually reading that headline. I asserted before and believe even more now that it is a fiction, and moreover there is not a hint of that story, using for that matter any recognisble combination of those key words, before 1986. I.e. it's not a question of finding a headline that vaguely resembles the "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" one, but finding an account that links the headline to the naming of the dance.
But thanks for raising the Nazi connection. Personally I only came to realise how despicable Lindbergh's outlook was through trying to fathom out this particular story. Now, as far as I am concerned, even if someone could prove the Lindbergh link story, we shouldn't commemorate the man because he held such despicable views, re the Nazis, unrepentantly to his dying day.
But that is another discussion. Let's focus on whether anyone can identify an account that links a newspaper headline that celebrates Lindbergh's flight to the creation of the dance, before 1986.
Originally posted Monday, December 28, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan"
Recent contributions provide useful examples of this underlying reluctance to acknowledge the creative impact of Harlem itself:
CafeSavoy wrote:
Quote until it was eclipsed by the Palladium, the Savoy Ballroom was a major hub of Latin music and dancing.
I don't see how Rayned's comment implies reluctance to acknowledge creativity from Harlem. The Savoy Ballroom (the major hub mentioned in his post) was in Harlem.
The footage of the Mambo I've seen from the 1940's - 1950's from the "When the spirit moves" documentary certainly looks a lot like Lindy Hop. The documentary shows Mambo footage which has swing outs and other Lindy Hop moves. Since so many dancers also danced the Lindy it was natural that many moves from that dance would find its way in the Mambo.
Mambo prior to Swing's influence had a few simple turns and was mostly fancy footwork and shines. (like what is on this footage from 2:16 on)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUmGBFusL_I
And this old recording (although to me the music in this one is more like African drum beat rather than normal Mambo with the clave rhythm):
Originally posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 (2 years ago)
Hi Deacon,
Re your Mambo point I said more or less the same thing myself on Dec 20 thus can t see a sufficient enough difference to respond to.
Re your first point, I guess we use the English language differently (I have actually been asked a few times in the US as to whether I speak English?!) If someone talks about the Savoy being eclipsed by another ballroom when it wasn t for two reasons - the other ballroom was a different kind of operation and the Savoy was booming anyway - then it seems to me that the writer responsible, however innocently, has picked up on a negative vibe. I could explain the Savoy s involvement with Latin in more detail, but that would be another discussion.
This your point Deacon has an echo of this discussion s main concern, i.e. has anyone found the Lindy Hops The Atlantic headline in that I m sure the vast majority of those who continue to propagate this fiction do so in all innocence with not a trace of negativity in mind. Nevertheless that story and the way it is now so tenaciously adhered to, suggests it has become freighted to some degree with a dismissive take on Harlem s cultural authorship. Its retention however is even more remarkable now that it is increasingly looking as if the headline story was created in 1986 by Warren and Ryan, and again let me reiterate, in all innocence.
Apologies if I seem a hardened contrarian, but this does seem an excellent means of thoroughly testing this conjecture of mine, although I can t help agreeing it would all be so much simpler if the headline story was true, and Lindbergh had of been just a real nice guy as projected.
I should also explain, that in as much as this headline linking of the flight and dance came from the JLH, I feel a responsible for doing what I can to clear up the world-wide confusion that it has caused.
Originally posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 (2 years ago)
But even if there was a headline: "Lindy Hops the Atlantic" it wouldn't prove anything. It would be consistent with the popular story but it's possible that Shorty George never saw the paper even if it existed.
What is historically clear is that Lindbergh was a very popular figure at the time and that many things (businesses etc.) were being named "Lindy" after him.
I'm not sure if newsboys were still around in NYC at the time but it's possible that when the Atlantic flight did occur then they did announce it something like "Lindy Hops the Atlantic".
Some evidence that Fox Movietone news did cover the dance marathon would be more conclusive - although that wouldn't prove that Shorty George made up the name on the spot.
I think it would be interesting to know if the name Lindy Hop came from the name (of the dance) Lindbergh Hop or whether it arose independantly.
I don't think we'll ever know exactly where the name came from - though the connection with Lindbergh is undoubtable. I would put a different spin on the popularity of the modern story though. It provides a neat and tidy explanation of the origin of the name that satisfies most dancers. Those of us who are more interested in the dance history will do our homework and find that there are doubts - many of the more meaty Lindy Hop history websites voice these. People like certainty and simplicity in their history - as much of it is uncertain and complex (two attributes that most people are averse to) and are thus going to believe and remember a short simple story than a lengthy essay on the possible origins of the name. The name itself - a rich white aviator - already dismisses Harlem's cultural authorship.
Lindberghs later connections with being pro-Nazi (although there are some doubts about whether he was actually pro-Nazi or just against the USA becoming involved in what many saw as a 'European war') are probably largely responsible for the dissapearance of the name Lindy Hop in favour of Jitterbug (and others). I think this in part leads to the myth that the dance all but died out in the post-war period.
Originally posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "Penguinbob" Some evidence that Fox Movietone news did cover the dance marathon would be more conclusive - although that wouldn't prove that Shorty George made up the name on the spot.
Shorty George had to "Hop" every time he wanted to lead Big Bea into an under arm turn. (See clip)
Originally posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "terry monaghan" Hi Deacon,
Re your first point, I guess we use the English language differently (I have actually been asked a few times in the US as to whether I speak English?!) If someone talks about the Savoy being eclipsed by another ballroom when it wasn t for two reasons - the other ballroom was a different kind of operation and the Savoy was booming anyway - then it seems to me that the writer responsible, however innocently, has picked up on a negative vibe. I could explain the Savoy s involvement with Latin in more detail, but that would be another discussion.
Terry
I think you are reading too much into nuances. Are you stating that the center of Latin dancing didn't move from the Savoy to the Palladium?
Originally posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 (2 years ago)
Quoted from "Deacon Jones"
Shorty George had to "Hop" every time he wanted to lead Big Bea into an under arm turn. (See clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Sdk3mqVSRA
True, but irrelevant. The term "Hop" was being applied to many dances and dance patterns at the time. And at the time when the term Lindy Hop first came into usage, I don't think Shorty George was partnered with Big Bea.
Originally posted Wednesday, December 30, 2009 (2 years ago)
Penguinbob wrote
Quote at the time when the term Lindy Hop first came into usage, I don't think Shorty George was partnered with Big Bea
that's my understanding too.
CafeSociety wrote
Quote Are you stating that the center of Latin dancing didn't move from the Savoy to the Palladium?
No, I'm saying the Savoy was never the 'center of Latin dancing' anymore than it was for non-Lindy ballroom dancing, or indeed the other types of dancing and music that were enjoyed there. While it featured Latin all the way back to the introduction of the rumba, just a brief survey of the bands who played indicates that swing remained its core business. From the beginning the Palladium was the centre for NY styled Mambo, and the Savoy only shared in that.
Penguinbob wrote previously
Quote People like certainty and simplicity in their history - as much of it is uncertain and complex (two attributes that most people are averse to) and are thus going to believe and remember a short simple story than a lengthy essay on the possible origins of the name.
Although you are probably right in that most people prefer neat 'urban myths' (I guess before that 'rural myths'?) as historical explanaitions, such efforts dont really qualify for the term 'history.' The latter require rigorous research and analysis, and I would agree that is not for everyone. However given the digitilsation of knowledge now rapidly taking place, new opportunities are opening up for making the kind of quantitative enquiries that weren't possible before. Thus we can use search engines to check on the growth or decline in use of a precise term such as "Lindy Hops the Atlantic" in a way that can contribute to historical understanding. That means even popular cultural history is now opening up for real research as the old barriers of the lack of relevent commentaries about them are overcome.
and
Quote Lindberghs later connections with being pro-Nazi (although there are some doubts about whether he was actually pro-Nazi or just against the USA becoming involved in what many saw as a 'European war')
I read a 1935 Amsterdam News editorial once that apologised for Harlem audiences booing every time Lindbergh was shown on the movienews - and this was prior to his involvement with the Nazis. I don't want to make this a diversion, but I would urge you to read more, as the Lindbergh issue is a lot more complex than is now often thought of. Perhaps the most obvious evidence is Stephen Spielberg's dropping the option to make a film based on Berg's recent, and supposedly definitive biography of Lindbergh in 1998. Spielberg had bought the film-rights without reading the book first. When the extent of Lindbergh's anti-semitism was made clear to him he wisely thought best to leave the subject alone.
I don't have the time to continue with this thread as I have to focus on other writing tasks. I've also just read it through again (one should constantly re-check!) and I've realised I altered the discussion to focus on the "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" headline. Thus I also think it right that I back off and leave the way open for those who want to return to the original question and its reival by Ake. However it's been thought provoking, and most definately something of use to me. Thankyou.
Terry
ps to my utter astonishment I learned only recently that the conventional account of the 'marathon' (the race that is) deriving from the alleged 26 miles and 385 yards it took for the Greek soldier Pheidippides, to bring the news of the Greek victory over the Persians from the Battle of Marathon (the namesake of the race) to Athens, is yet another "urban myth". That precise distance actually derives from a London, UK 're-enactment' of the 'race' in the early 20th Century, between Windsor Castle (where it started) to the former (i.e. now demolished) White City arena in West London. God knows how many of these 'beliefs' we still retain!
which seems to much more archive access (or at least searchability).
There's about 30 odd references to "Lindy Hop", "Lindy's Hop" or "Lindy Hops" in connection to various flights of Charles Lindbergh in 1927 and 1928. None of them seem to have been from papers in New York and none mention the Atlantic crossing and all are from the post Atlantic-flight period, with the earliest being the article posted earlier about a flight to St. Louis.
Some other interesting references regarding the name though. For example:
Quote ...To show how the church people of Harlem felt towards the dance which they consider immoral, we will just run through their statements. This dance, as you know will be known as "The New Lindbergh Hop...According to the management of Roseland which arranged the exhibition, the feature of the dance and the reason for the name are the terrific speed at which the couples whirl and glide. ... Contention that the "Lindy Hop" is in any way representative of the colored race and is danced in Harlem only behind closed doors, came from Miss Nina Wilson secretary to Dr. Bishop of St. Philip's Church at 220 W. 134th Street.... It consists of seven movements, he explained, and introduces tap dancing into ballroom dancing for the first time.
On another note it appears that Fox Movietone News did cover the dance Marathon in June 1928. See here
This would seem to add some weight to the account that appears in Stearns. Anyone in South Carolina able to check it out?
Anyone track down *the* Lindy Hop newspaper cover?
Apologies if this has come up before, but I figured that if the Yehoodi folk have not found this then it probably desn't exist. I have tried to find the newspaper cover that was supposedly used as the inspiration for the term "Lindy Hop". I am sure you all know the story told by…
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 Next > (64 items total)
The article above is dated March 1931. Though it probably doesn't add anything to the "who named what when" question, an article in the "Kansas City Call" dated July 10, 1931 mentions the the "new" Lindy Hop dance. It was going to be demonstrated by Woodie Walder, who was one of the musicians in Bennie Moten's Orchestra.
Thanks especially to Judy, Ake and Lindy George for posting up those clippings, none of which I'd seen before, although I've read similar material to the latter.
I take the view that 'history' is always about the present, and thus there are underlying reasons why we are collectively interested in considering these issues at the present, and maybe even why it is resulting in productive exchanges.
As some of you know I've been fretting about this Lindbergh issue for a number of years, but only now is it beginning to make sense. I can't help but feel that the loss of Frankie hangs over us all, and is provoking new thinking. To put it briefly, the Lindy Hop can't do without its real history.
I do agree with Ake though, the important thing is to publish results which I'm attempting to get on with and complete, but at times I feel I can't ignore significant discussions when they spring up.
Just noticed a related discussion on the BBC website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/strictlycomedancing/F14713549?thread=7148544
and I also checked Google's advanced search which has now leapt to 23,900 since I last checked a couple of weeks ago - can this mistaken notion really be multiplying that fast?
Terry, why do those peoplle talk funny?
Everyone has gotta read that thread, it's hillarious. At first I thought it was a comedy script written about clueless people who never heard of this lindy hop dance.
Terry, I re-read this thread. You mentioned in the earlier post (the second post in the thread Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:44 am):
" (And even then it should be remembered that he only gave Marshall Stearns this account in 1959, although he had given other versions of the same story previously to other interviewers.) "
I wonder where we can find those other versions of the story, which Shorty George gave to other interviewers?
Hi!
John sent me a few links: One to the newspaper site, where the term 'hop' is used in the connection to the Lindbergh flight:
http://www.newspaperarchive.com/FreePdfViewer.aspx?topic=1927 3a Lindbergh begins trans-Atlantic flight&img=31127423&terms=Lindbergh&dpviewdate=05 2f20 2f07&firstvisit=true
There are at least two references with 'hop'.
Frankyboy, are these the same articles that you found?
In addition to that 'hop' is a slang term for a dance that goes back at least to 1913: http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/hop
Those in addition to Peter BetBasoo's discoveries. There seemed to be several possibilities to name The (Harlem) Lindy Hop also according to Charles Lindbergh's famous flight. I think that there are reasons to take the Lindbergh connection back to discussion.
Not sure as it didn't give me anymore then the sentence the search phrase was in (think I posted it earlier in thread but not sure). I did the free sample search so don't have results saved.[/i]
Frankyboy wrote:
Basically as the whole International (British) Competition style is full of pretension on the inside, with an arbitrary and thus meaningless assortment of dance technique aspects on the outside, that is simply meant to convey how superior is dancers really are. Hence the familiar banalities of referring to 'ballroom jive' as 'jive' and as a 'Latin dance' when in fact it is neither. Once they have to depart from their usual clich s they really don't know what to say, and out comes the nonsense. I've written enough about this in the past, and thus don't want to repeat myself again! Just a little bit of conscientious research would come up with a background explanation that this non-American use of the word 'jive' stems from the HMB changing the neame of the relevent category to 'jitterbug-jive' in 1942 that was then shortened to the latter, and different variations of it have emerged subsequently. But that would mean taking 'the colonials' seriously in cultural matters, and of course that is unthinkable!
Re the other points - my major concern right now is with synthesis of understanding rather than endlessly trawling for 'new' individual facts. Any worthwhile discussion needs to refer to what has been agreed so far in order to get more specific about precise areas of misunderstanding or uncertainty. Thus various people have been over that Lindbergh Hop thing at different times, (including myself who rescued it from several decades of being forgotten), and thus most people who have taken an interest now agree it did exist as a dance, and although proceeding the Lindy Hop it also ran in parallel with it, and thus is not the same dance.
Similarly with Snowden's interviews. For various reasons I don't have them to hand, but I can assure you they say the same thing as the Stearns interview, with the exception of one, that asserts that he and Mattie created the dance by accident. A plausible story, that I think has been repeated elsewhere anyway. The best verification of Snowden's story is in Carl Van Vechten's novel "Parties" that was published in 1930, and thus considerable before Snowden's viewpoint is known to have appeared in print. Incidentally as best as I can remember it doesn't mention CL.
The main advantage we now have in researching this area is that we can compare the new interest in the Lindy and Savoy that has emerged outside Harlem since the beginning of the 1980s with the original Savoy based one, with which it overlapped. Thus there is an interesting mix of continuities and discontinuities. When I had the issue of the bogus headline "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" literally shoved under my nose in 1987, I realised here was something tangible to look at, especially as it began within the limits of our current experience. So if the argument that it is phoney stands up, yet nevertheless it is spreading round the world at an accelerating rate, by making the necessary additions and subtractions we can use it to understand more about how such myths were generated and spread during the first time round. The current high speed of developments is particularly useful in this respect.
At the same time this provides a more comprehensive reply to the original question as to whether anyone has discovered that headline. One answer is simply "No", but that answer quite reasonably begs a further question 'if so where did this erroneous assertion come from?' I've given one answer to the latter, and other useful points have emerged in this discussion that offer confirmation. Cutting down the associated myths to their just size is, I would suggest, the best way of getting an accurate grip on the subject, and that means explaining their consequences just as much as their origins.
Terry
[quote="terry monaghan"]Penguinbob wrote:
Terry, I have always wondered about the relationship of Mambo and Cha Cha and dances in the Swing genre. The Hustle is classified as a Swing dance, but it never occurred to me that it would come through the Mambo. This is very illuminating.
I have also wondered about the Cha Cha, whose weight changes are identical to Lindy Hop, and how it may relate to Lindy Hop. I read once it was inspired by Lindy Hop, but I have lost that reference.
Hi Keepa
The late Dicky Harris (won the HMB in 1966) of the Mama Lou Parks dancers told me that when he showed friends in Harlem the Mura Dehn footage of mambo at the Savoy that they just couldn't believe that regular young Harlemites were ever that passionate about the Mambo. Yet the infusion was real, and even now its not hard to see the Lindy legacy in Salsa, although of course it just doesn't swing.
Thus there is a parallel between that fast style of rumba/son being put together with big band swing music, and the respective dance styles being changed by the addition of a good helping of Lindy in the early 1950s to produce New York Mambo as we now know it. Hence my irritation with those who say nothing happened in the 1950's in terms of Lindy. The best mambo dancers came to the Savoy, and the best lindy hoppers went to the Palladium!
The hustle emerged in the late 1960s as the NY Latin scene wanted to get back to partner dancing, and it caught on quickly long before Saturday Night Fever. I suspect the besides leading on to Salsa, the Hustle also had an impact on the emergence of West Coast Swing as we know it, but I realise some people boil over with anger at that suggestion!
Re the Cha-Cha, it wasn't really a partner dance originally, so I doubt a direct Lindy connection, but of course it became the major dance expression of Doo Wop as so many of the key tracks had a Cha-Cha beat. I wouldn't be surprised if it became cross influenced by Lindy remnants as a result of popular dancing to different types of this music, i.e. swing, r&b and latin, which didn't consist of only slow tempos.
And by way of an apology for those annoyed with this seeming departure from the original question - these questions are all part of the incredible versatility and variety of the Lindy Hop which is why it has never needed the 'Lindy Hops The Atlantic' fiction to keep the dance alive.
Terry
ps in relation to Frankyboy's question about why do the Strictly Come Dancing people talk so weird - the finals of the latest series demonstrated why. Despite the clear choice of the judges who voted for a black guy and white girl to come first, a decision it seems supported by most other people in the wider world interested in dancing, the core ballroom fraternity voted for a white couple to win. The bias was obvious, but it remains an embarrasment that the organisers and the BBC in particular don't want to talk about. That discussion site was shut down immediately once the final decision had been announced!
There is some 50 year old footage people dancing to cha-cha music in this clip. Note they aren't great dancers but still people dancing socially to Cha-cha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ1BaRCqjbE
Deacon Jones wrote:
possibly there's a misunderstanding here? I doubt whether there were any significant 'performance' cha-cha dancers at all, in otherwords it was all social. The point I was trying to make was that Doo Wop vocal groups used Cha-Cha rhythms in their songs on occasions , thus it would be reasonable to suppose that those dancing to them would actually be socially dancing the Cha-Cha. Perhaps I was being too brief!
(sorry for the further drift
I don't know much about the dancing part, but the reason so much Doo Wop has Latin rhythms is because
a) George Goldner and his buddy Mo Levy, who produced a lot of the greatest stuff and also were two of the biggest crooks ever in the music business, were Latin music and dancing fiends. Goldner actually got his start by founding Tico records in the late 40's, one of the most important early Latin record labels. He also just about invented payolla.
b)Leiber & Stoller loved latin music and rhythms so much that their collection of percussion instruments - used for hits like "Spanish Harlem" - became known in the industry as the "Leiber & Stoller Kit".
Also American folk music has always had lots of songs using latin rhythms eg some of the the biggest names in blues, like Elmore James, recorded a lot of songs in latin time.
and while I know nothing of the latin dancing I do know I would have had the major hots for Mar a Antonieta Pons)
"Style is originality; fashion is fascism.The two are eternally and unalterably opposed." - Lester Bangs
Hustle link to lindy seems to be more through the intermediary of East Coast Swing. You can see it in the early Hustle which used a 6-count basic. The footwork used to be some variant of touch-step, triple step. walk-walk. Many of the old time hustle dancers still phrase in 6, whether using the old basic or phrasing the new basic in 6 (&-1-2 3-&-4 5-6). I remember Craig Hutchinson who always included Hustle as a swing dance in his competitions, always taught hustle as a 6-count dance.
The relation between Cha Cha/Mambo and Lindy Hop seems to be more one of cross-pollination of music and dance. Musically, it seemed American and Cuban musicians listened to each other and used what they heard as inspiration. Supposedly mambo music developed when Cuban musicians (e.g., Chacao) etc) inspired by jazz/swing made innovations to the music of their day. Similarly you hear about jazz musicians being influenced by "the latin tinge"(e.g., WC Handy, Jelly Roll Morton, etc.). Plus you had musicians who were in both swing and Latin bands; for example, Mario Bauza, the father of Afro-Cuban Jazz, was an important figure in both Chick Webb's and Machito's bands. Finally, you have that whole debate over whether the swing rhythm and clave have common origins.
In regards to dance, you also have proximity that could lead to cross pollination. Up until it was eclipsed by the Palladium, the Savoy Ballroom was a major hub of Latin music and dancing. And you had many dancers who did both. Apparently in the 40s and 50s, Latin dancing was as popular as swing in the black community. I'm not sure if that was primarily just in NYC, but I attended a lecture once about the huge mambo scene that existed in DC back then.
Even now you can see the influence of Lindy/Jazz in the mambo jazz steps and breaks. I was quite surprised to find that Suzy-Qs are the of the first breaks they teach in mambo.
There's another parallel between Cha Cha and Lindy, and that is they both changed because of changes in the music; the tempos moderated some and there was more accents in the music.
It does look very different from the Lindy Suzy-Q though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZFTQdaCex4
Here is the article, where Herbert 'Whitey' White is mentioned as the creator of The Lindy Hop. I wrote it down here:
The Pittsburgh Courier September 28, 1940:
"Developing New Dance In Honor Of Joe Louis
Herbert White, creator of the famous Lindy Hop, will give the country a new dance some time this year, when he unveils his Joe Louis Shuffle. He's shown here taking a few of his dancers through the paces, getting them in the mood for things to come. Dance is named in honor of the Brown Bomber."
I think that he never really created Joe Louis Shuffle.
It s worth keeping this discussion as close to the original question about the elusive Lindbergh headline as it seems there are many out there who still believe that story to be valid. In addition to reiterating that no one has found anything close to that alleged original headline, this discussion has gathered support for the argument that it was manufactured in 1986 by pointing out that no contemporary account during the relevant period 1986-88 mentioned it either. Thus if it had of existed, it is unlikely in the extreme that it wouldn t have been mentioned.
While those issues are still worth digging over, perhaps it s time to look at why this myth came into being?
Put briefly I would suggest that the US embraced the dance and music, and especially the Lindy Hop, that resulted from the creativity of Harlem in the 1920-30s a lot more quickly than it ever did the community responsible. The Lindbergh myth thus filled the tricky gap that emerged by the lack of any satisfactory explanation for a dance which took off with such dramatic speed. Any relevant detailed factual enquiry inevitably bumps up against this issue, thus prompting to those not that bothered with the theory of it all to take the easy way out. Thus the faster the dance has spread round the world in recent times, the Lindbergh headline myth has grown equally quickly.
Recent contributions provide useful examples of this underlying reluctance to acknowledge the creative impact of Harlem itself:
CafeSavoy wrote:
Latin music and dance grew steadily at the Savoy from when it was first introduced there in the early 1930s, until it closed in 1958. The Palladium thus never 'eclipsed' the Savoy, but it did do something dramatically different. Contrary to widespread misconception, it was Peurto Rican musicians and dancers who led the way there in creating the new NY style of Mambo - as oppossed to 'Cubans', a development that the Savoy supported enthusiastically. For the duration it was a NY v Cuban thing (echoes of which still exist) rather than any sense of rivalry between the two ballrooms. The Savoy never deviated from its major function of catering to major sections of the African Diaspora that congregated in NY.
[/b] also re:
That just seems a bit too vague. I can only cite my own experience in that we did four walk steps with the skip one either at the end or the beginning, and as in London we were pretty low down the food chain at the time in terms of the original scene of the dance, I think it indicative of popular dance expressions prefering sequences that match the music. Invariably its dance teachers who screw things up by introducing six-counts when the music is 4/4. Let's face it they make more money from the endless complications that this innovation entails!
also re:
On this issue I stick closer to the Lindbergh story than you evidently do, in the sense that I believe that the dance aspect of Jazz had and has its own development i.e. it wasn't just reacting to the changes in the music. While I disagree that Charles Lindbergh caused that change in the dance, I go for the evidence that others have produced that the dance dimension and the Lindy in particular was a causal factor too in making Swing happen at the end of the 1920s.
Zev wrote:[b]
Actually I don't think it is much of a 'drift' but relevant. I'd put the empahsis on rather on the 'biggest crooks' aspect, rather than them being 'music and dancing fiends' as the 'Hit Makers' book from which I suspect this point comes from suggests. Goldner was a habitual drunk and Maurice Levy a wannabee Mafioso, who for obvious reasons couldn't join up. President Eisenhower(I think he was on the throne at the time?) probably knew more about Doo Wop than either of those two did. Even that book indicates that Goldner and Levy didn't know anything other than how to make money by taking advantage of other people s creativity. Levy became involved in Doo Wop when he realised why use illegal force to get regular payments (Mafia style) when he could own the copyright and do the same thing legally? They had to be told which Doo Wop group to sign up, let alone what to mix up with Latin influences.
Happy Holidays!
Terry
Here's a reproduction print of the May 20, 1927 edition of The Baltimore News. Given the other headlines I've seen posted, Lindy was apparently hopping all over.
From "Let's Dance" by Peter Buckman, printed in 1978 (page 189):
The original question concerned the alleged specific headline "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" - to trawl through each and every reference to Lindbergh probably couldn't be handled by all the dance forums put together. But if you can find a reference to that actual headline before 1986, that would be of great interest!
Terry
This website contains a number of news papers archived from all over:
http://www.newspaperarchive.com
While there is no match for the exact phrase: "Lindy Hops Atlantic" or "Lindbergh hops Atlantic". When you do a search for "all of the words" you come across several articles about Lindbergh and the term is used all over in this period for flights. There are articles about 'Zeppelin hops'.
Unfortunately this site is a paying site so if you care enough about the answer to subscribe feel free to do so.
Given the current use of the "hops" term in conjunction with Lindy, the story is plausible.
I checked a page dedicated to Lindbergh to see if there were any newspaper scans. There were not but there were PDF files of the FBI dossier on him which in itself is interesting as he was beleived to be a Nazi sympathizer:
http://www.charleslindbergh.com/fbi/index.asp
Hi Deacon
no question about it, and you certainly don't have to spend money to find that out, Lindbergh was most defininately a Nazi lover - and to quote him precisely it was the "Jews and the English" who were responsible for WW2. Adolf it seems was misunderstood, although Lindbergh never said another word about that after the Fuhrer declared war on the USA following Pearl Habour. Sorry not my kind of hero by any measure.
However that is all irrelevent to the original question, as indeed are the sundry other points about Lindbergh and his various 'Hops' which I totally agree abound in many newspaper stories.
Slingshots original question concerned whether the actual newspaper headling "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" had finally been found. And given the huge number of references that are almost entirely derived from swing sites round the world, it seems logical to stick to the point, as all these accounts hinge on Snowden (usually) actually reading that headline. I asserted before and believe even more now that it is a fiction, and moreover there is not a hint of that story, using for that matter any recognisble combination of those key words, before 1986. I.e. it's not a question of finding a headline that vaguely resembles the "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" one, but finding an account that links the headline to the naming of the dance.
But thanks for raising the Nazi connection. Personally I only came to realise how despicable Lindbergh's outlook was through trying to fathom out this particular story. Now, as far as I am concerned, even if someone could prove the Lindbergh link story, we shouldn't commemorate the man because he held such despicable views, re the Nazis, unrepentantly to his dying day.
But that is another discussion. Let's focus on whether anyone can identify an account that links a newspaper headline that celebrates Lindbergh's flight to the creation of the dance, before 1986.
Terry
I don't see how Rayned's comment implies reluctance to acknowledge creativity from Harlem. The Savoy Ballroom (the major hub mentioned in his post) was in Harlem.
The footage of the Mambo I've seen from the 1940's - 1950's from the "When the spirit moves" documentary certainly looks a lot like Lindy Hop. The documentary shows Mambo footage which has swing outs and other Lindy Hop moves. Since so many dancers also danced the Lindy it was natural that many moves from that dance would find its way in the Mambo.
Mambo prior to Swing's influence had a few simple turns and was mostly fancy footwork and shines. (like what is on this footage from 2:16 on)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUmGBFusL_I
And this old recording (although to me the music in this one is more like African drum beat rather than normal Mambo with the clave rhythm):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csylf26g-dQ
Hi Deacon,
Re your Mambo point I said more or less the same thing myself on Dec 20 thus can t see a sufficient enough difference to respond to.
Re your first point, I guess we use the English language differently (I have actually been asked a few times in the US as to whether I speak English?!) If someone talks about the Savoy being eclipsed by another ballroom when it wasn t for two reasons - the other ballroom was a different kind of operation and the Savoy was booming anyway - then it seems to me that the writer responsible, however innocently, has picked up on a negative vibe. I could explain the Savoy s involvement with Latin in more detail, but that would be another discussion.
This your point Deacon has an echo of this discussion s main concern, i.e. has anyone found the Lindy Hops The Atlantic headline in that I m sure the vast majority of those who continue to propagate this fiction do so in all innocence with not a trace of negativity in mind. Nevertheless that story and the way it is now so tenaciously adhered to, suggests it has become freighted to some degree with a dismissive take on Harlem s cultural authorship. Its retention however is even more remarkable now that it is increasingly looking as if the headline story was created in 1986 by Warren and Ryan, and again let me reiterate, in all innocence.
Apologies if I seem a hardened contrarian, but this does seem an excellent means of thoroughly testing this conjecture of mine, although I can t help agreeing it would all be so much simpler if the headline story was true, and Lindbergh had of been just a real nice guy as projected.
I should also explain, that in as much as this headline linking of the flight and dance came from the JLH, I feel a responsible for doing what I can to clear up the world-wide confusion that it has caused.
Terry
But even if there was a headline: "Lindy Hops the Atlantic" it wouldn't prove anything. It would be consistent with the popular story but it's possible that Shorty George never saw the paper even if it existed.
What is historically clear is that Lindbergh was a very popular figure at the time and that many things (businesses etc.) were being named "Lindy" after him.
I'm not sure if newsboys were still around in NYC at the time but it's possible that when the Atlantic flight did occur then they did announce it something like "Lindy Hops the Atlantic".
Some evidence that Fox Movietone news did cover the dance marathon would be more conclusive - although that wouldn't prove that Shorty George made up the name on the spot.
I think it would be interesting to know if the name Lindy Hop came from the name (of the dance) Lindbergh Hop or whether it arose independantly.
I don't think we'll ever know exactly where the name came from - though the connection with Lindbergh is undoubtable. I would put a different spin on the popularity of the modern story though. It provides a neat and tidy explanation of the origin of the name that satisfies most dancers. Those of us who are more interested in the dance history will do our homework and find that there are doubts - many of the more meaty Lindy Hop history websites voice these. People like certainty and simplicity in their history - as much of it is uncertain and complex (two attributes that most people are averse to) and are thus going to believe and remember a short simple story than a lengthy essay on the possible origins of the name. The name itself - a rich white aviator - already dismisses Harlem's cultural authorship.
Lindberghs later connections with being pro-Nazi (although there are some doubts about whether he was actually pro-Nazi or just against the USA becoming involved in what many saw as a 'European war') are probably largely responsible for the dissapearance of the name Lindy Hop in favour of Jitterbug (and others). I think this in part leads to the myth that the dance all but died out in the post-war period.
Shorty George had to "Hop" every time he wanted to lead Big Bea into an under arm turn. (See clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Sdk3mqVSRA
I think you are reading too much into nuances. Are you stating that the center of Latin dancing didn't move from the Savoy to the Palladium?
True, but irrelevant. The term "Hop" was being applied to many dances and dance patterns at the time. And at the time when the term Lindy Hop first came into usage, I don't think Shorty George was partnered with Big Bea.
Penguinbob wrote
that's my understanding too.
CafeSociety wrote
No, I'm saying the Savoy was never the 'center of Latin dancing' anymore than it was for non-Lindy ballroom dancing, or indeed the other types of dancing and music that were enjoyed there. While it featured Latin all the way back to the introduction of the rumba, just a brief survey of the bands who played indicates that swing remained its core business. From the beginning the Palladium was the centre for NY styled Mambo, and the Savoy only shared in that.
Penguinbob wrote previously
Although you are probably right in that most people prefer neat 'urban myths' (I guess before that 'rural myths'?) as historical explanaitions, such efforts dont really qualify for the term 'history.' The latter require rigorous research and analysis, and I would agree that is not for everyone. However given the digitilsation of knowledge now rapidly taking place, new opportunities are opening up for making the kind of quantitative enquiries that weren't possible before. Thus we can use search engines to check on the growth or decline in use of a precise term such as "Lindy Hops the Atlantic" in a way that can contribute to historical understanding. That means even popular cultural history is now opening up for real research as the old barriers of the lack of relevent commentaries about them are overcome.
and
I read a 1935 Amsterdam News editorial once that apologised for Harlem audiences booing every time Lindbergh was shown on the movienews - and this was prior to his involvement with the Nazis. I don't want to make this a diversion, but I would urge you to read more, as the Lindbergh issue is a lot more complex than is now often thought of. Perhaps the most obvious evidence is Stephen Spielberg's dropping the option to make a film based on Berg's recent, and supposedly definitive biography of Lindbergh in 1998. Spielberg had bought the film-rights without reading the book first. When the extent of Lindbergh's anti-semitism was made clear to him he wisely thought best to leave the subject alone.
I don't have the time to continue with this thread as I have to focus on other writing tasks. I've also just read it through again (one should constantly re-check!) and I've realised I altered the discussion to focus on the "Lindy Hops The Atlantic" headline. Thus I also think it right that I back off and leave the way open for those who want to return to the original question and its reival by Ake. However it's been thought provoking, and most definately something of use to me. Thankyou.
Terry
ps to my utter astonishment I learned only recently that the conventional account of the 'marathon' (the race that is) deriving from the alleged 26 miles and 385 yards it took for the Greek soldier Pheidippides, to bring the news of the Greek victory over the Persians from the Battle of Marathon (the namesake of the race) to Athens, is yet another "urban myth". That precise distance actually derives from a London, UK 're-enactment' of the 'race' in the early 20th Century, between Windsor Castle (where it started) to the former (i.e. now demolished) White City arena in West London. God knows how many of these 'beliefs' we still retain!
I have recently stumbled across thissite:
which seems to much more archive access (or at least searchability).
There's about 30 odd references to "Lindy Hop", "Lindy's Hop" or "Lindy Hops" in connection to various flights of Charles Lindbergh in 1927 and 1928. None of them seem to have been from papers in New York and none mention the Atlantic crossing and all are from the post Atlantic-flight period, with the earliest being the article posted earlier about a flight to St. Louis.
Some other interesting references regarding the name though. For example:
The Afro American - May 17, 1930, Baltimore - on an exhibition of Lindy Hop at the Roseland Ballroom.
On another note it appears that Fox Movietone News did cover the dance Marathon in June 1928. See here
This would seem to add some weight to the account that appears in Stearns. Anyone in South Carolina able to check it out?
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 Next > (64 items total)
BBCode is no longer supported. Use Markdown instead: