Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
We just need to show these new kids that when it comes to real dancing, they are out of their league. We need to create an all-new reality tv series that will showcase true talent (namely: ours) and focus on the things that really matter.
Like how many vibrating light-bulbs can be sewn into a single sequined leotard...
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
ooooh there are clearly deficiencies in the current state of reality-tv-dance-programs-incorporating-partnered-acts.... not surprising, considering their creators cannot possibly be up to date on current dance competition trends.
i'm speaking, of course, of the irrational focus on "dance ability", this ill-defined, subjective concept that seems to account for almost all of the evaluation criteria in these programs. we need to shift the focus from "ability" to more tangible, cutting-edge, state-of-the-art metrics.
for instance, skirt length. easily measured, using several different metrics (centimeters, inches, social decency, draftiness, etc.) but have we ever seen a competitor win a competition based on skirt length? nooooo. it's always things like "clean lines" or "degree of difficulty".
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
oh definitely, the expert.
off the top of my head, some metrics for selecting judges:
-age
-amount of chest hair
-colorblind or not?
-number of dance-related injuries sustained
-preferred shoe color (white, obviously)
-ability to raise one eyebrow while simultaneously writing
-fluency
-upper-arm strength
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
and we'll need criteria for selecting contestants, too.
it makes for a poignant and socially incisive "audition" episode, if we can get in many of the country's top competitors and build their hopes up, only to crush them when we expose their intense inadequacy when evaluated on our criteria!
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
That should be pretty easy...
First round knock-outs:
Peter Strom-- too much rhythm, not enough miming
Frida Segerdahl-- not enough sequins
Max Pitruzzella-- needs tighter pants
Mikey Faltesek-- only if you make out with lucy. or zombie lucy, your pick.
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
Which brings me to my next point. I think partner dances are too simple. This is the twenty-first century people! The age of threesomes. Teams, even.
Let's pit Silver Shadows against 23 Skidoo in a battle of the shiny shirts. I'd like to see who can show the most underwear in the shortest amount of time.
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
Ten points for dropping the invisible baby before swinging out. That was pure genius. Shows a true dedication to lindy hop that is so rare to find these days.
Originally posted Tuesday, July 24, 2007 (4 years ago)
and for the semis, we can have doug vs. ben.
cause <a href="http://www.lucydunne.com/ireland/sprjews1.jpg">boy</a> on <a href="http://www.lucydunne.com/ireland/sprjews2.jpg">boy</a> is always funny....
except when it's <a href="http://www.tosomock.com/uploaded_images/brokeback-719976.jpg">hot</a>.
lucy and jojo only
dear god, lucy. what has happened to this scene? i think we have a crisis on our hands.
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 (83 items total)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7dP7dhzwpg
:)
that's my stunt double. sometimes she does things without my permission.
jo, i know my naked photoshopped self is distracting, but we need to get back to business here!
you made a good point about benji and lacey. they are cute kids, but let's start calling a spade a spade. or an evil usurper, as the case may be.
We just need to show these new kids that when it comes to real dancing, they are out of their league. We need to create an all-new reality tv series that will showcase true talent (namely: ours) and focus on the things that really matter.
Like how many vibrating light-bulbs can be sewn into a single sequined leotard...
ooooh there are clearly deficiencies in the current state of reality-tv-dance-programs-incorporating-partnered-acts.... not surprising, considering their creators cannot possibly be up to date on current dance competition trends.
i'm speaking, of course, of the irrational focus on "dance ability", this ill-defined, subjective concept that seems to account for almost all of the evaluation criteria in these programs. we need to shift the focus from "ability" to more tangible, cutting-edge, state-of-the-art metrics.
for instance, skirt length. easily measured, using several different metrics (centimeters, inches, social decency, draftiness, etc.) but have we ever seen a competitor win a competition based on skirt length? nooooo. it's always things like "clean lines" or "degree of difficulty".
Hair size.
Number of costume changes per 3-minute routine.
exactly!
and don't forget, the ultimate postmodern metric, envelope-pushing.
how far? how fast? how big is the envelope? downhill, or up?
We will need to hire Mark Eckstein to judge that one.
oh definitely, the expert.
off the top of my head, some metrics for selecting judges:
-age -amount of chest hair -colorblind or not? -number of dance-related injuries sustained -preferred shoe color (white, obviously) -ability to raise one eyebrow while simultaneously writing -fluency -upper-arm strength
-ability to be bribed -sexual stamina -toenail length -number of dance-related injuries sustained to partner -number of illegitimate children
and we'll need criteria for selecting contestants, too.
it makes for a poignant and socially incisive "audition" episode, if we can get in many of the country's top competitors and build their hopes up, only to crush them when we expose their intense inadequacy when evaluated on our criteria!
Holy Schadenfreude Batman. These girls mean biznass
y i no haz signature? Come on people, make with the funny.
That should be pretty easy...
First round knock-outs:
Peter Strom-- too much rhythm, not enough miming Frida Segerdahl-- not enough sequins Max Pitruzzella-- needs tighter pants Mikey Faltesek-- only if you make out with lucy. or zombie lucy, your pick.
hop swing & a jump makes a valiant showing, but one tear-away costume change does not a champion make....
do you think we could get tom cruise involved? i think he could go all the way...
Which brings me to my next point. I think partner dances are too simple. This is the twenty-first century people! The age of threesomes. Teams, even.
Let's pit Silver Shadows against 23 Skidoo in a battle of the shiny shirts. I'd like to see who can show the most underwear in the shortest amount of time.
yes. drop trou, boys!
but just dancing isn't enough to titillate the sophisticated tastes of the american public.
i think we're going to need death matches.
I recommend Thunderdome.
seguin vs frida. weapon: spastic twitch.
jordan frisbee vs simon selman. weapon: sideburns
doug vs sarah. weapon: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5hhZchymXM">invisible baby</a>
Ten points for dropping the invisible baby before swinging out. That was pure genius. Shows a true dedication to lindy hop that is so rare to find these days.
and for the semis, we can have doug vs. ben.
cause <a href="http://www.lucydunne.com/ireland/sprjews1.jpg">boy</a> on <a href="http://www.lucydunne.com/ireland/sprjews2.jpg">boy</a> is always funny....
except when it's <a href="http://www.tosomock.com/uploaded_images/brokeback-719976.jpg">hot</a>.
Don't forget Dax vs. Doug. Weapon: Underwater Swivels
They totally stole that off me. I made that up in my mother's womb.
Page(s): < Previous 1 2 3 (83 items total)
BBCode is no longer supported. Use Markdown instead: